The Palestinian/Israeli Conflict Awaits Resolution
By: Leroy A. Binns Ph.D.
The untimely and suspicious passing of PLO Chairman Yasser
Arafat on November 11 has left numerous questions unanswered. Among them, Will
his replacement former Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas overcome local deterrents
and energize the peace process by winning the hearts and minds of the Bush
administration and in so doing his counterpart Ariel Sharon?
At the turn of the century an historic meeting between
Arafat and Prime Minister Ehud Barak at the behest of President Clinton bore
signs of the 1978 Camp David Accord that showcased Egyptian President Anwar
Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin until the Palestinians rejected
partial return of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip and custodianship of East
Jerusalem.
Conditions of Camp David 2000 Summit
Israeli annexation of 9 to
10% of the West Bank inclusive of settlement blocs and 10 to 15% of the land
along the Jordan River – the latter on a long term lease.
A surrender of 1 to 3% of
Israeli territory in the Negev dessert to Palestine
A limited control of East Jerusalem to the Palestinians
The crisis later experienced a downward spiral with the
calculated visit by Sharon
to the Temple Mount . Such display of arrogance ignited
a confrontation between the Palestinians and his security and set the stage for
the intifada that “crescendoed” culminating in fatalities of over 3,000
Palestinians and 1,000 Israelis to date.
Consequences of the holy war have influenced international attention
as several attempts at restraint resulted in pacts on disengagement and further
negotiation. In 2001 former CIA director George Tenet was instrumental in
drafting an armistice while months later in joint sessions Arafat and Israeli
Foreign Minister Shimon Peres advocated in favor of similar ideals. US involvement
pursued in the proceeding year as retired Marine General Anthony Zinni was
dispatched to broker a peace treaty as were Vice President Dick Cheney and
Secretary of State Colin Powell in 2003. American sponsorship of tranquility
and political progress was also underscored in the President’s approval of the
Road Map – a plan scripted by Washington and a trio of foreign entities, the
European Union, Russia
and the United Nations.
Concept of the Road Map
Expectation Deadlines
An end to Palestinian
violence May
2003
Palestinian political reform,
Israeli withdrawal
and freeze on settlement
expectations, Palestinian
elections
Creation of an independent
Palestinian state June
– Dec 2003
International conference and
monitoring of
compliance with the road map.
Second international
conference, permanent status agreement early
2004 - 2005
and end of conflict,
agreement on final borders, clarification of
the highly controversial fate
of Jerusalem ,
refuges and
settlements, Arab states to
agree to peace deals with Israel .
The significance of the catastrophe was not lost on the
nongovernmental sector as a complimentary gesture better known as the Geneva
Accord spearheaded by moderates Yossi Beilin and Yasser Abed Rabbo revived the
spirit of the Camp David Summit by recommending the return of most of the West
Bank and the Gaza Strip in anticipation of restrictions on the amount of
Palestinian refugees who sought re-entry to Israel. Within his capacity as
prime minister, Abbas also engineered a truce by obtaining the allegiance of
armed factions Hamas and Fatah.
Palestinian Military Organizations and Affiliates
Name Activities
Hamas prior to
1989 fire bombing, arsons and other
property
damage.
since
1989 kidnappings, shootings, suicide
bombings
and bomb attacks
- a component of Fatah occasions
in conjunction with Hamas.
suicide
bombing assaults with Al-Aqsa Martyr’s
Brigades
Unfortunately the process of resolve has been transient.
Deportment cited above has provoked or been in retaliation of adversarial
aerial strikes, border closing and settlement and security blockade expansion –
some of which has been denounced by previous and present White House
administrations.
As evidence of democracy engulfs the Middle East
particularly in states such as Iraq, Lebanon, Egypt and Saudi Arabia some
observers have concurred that the onus is on the new Palestinian leadership
comprised of a revitalized cabinet to utilize these and other developments to
its advantage. Yet albeit the notion of parliamentary elections in Iraq, the
collapse of Syrian governance in Lebanon and presidential and municipal reforms
in Egypt and Saudi Arabia respectively could reduce the effectiveness of
radical Islamic behavior and therefore aid in the quest for Palestinian
statehood these illustrations are unpredictable and form but a single
commendatory element – a pursuit for participatory governmental amendments
within the Muslim society.
Consistency surrounding the ongoing rhetoric on this subject
matter may be judged equally destructive as the warring factions consciously or
unwittingly incite action. Occasions of conversion are rare with the likes of
staunch and convincing advocates on both sides of the spectrum. Abraham Soafer
a senior fellow at Stanford
University ’s Hoover
Institute could mistakenly be categorized as an Israeli spokesman on the highly
publicized Road Map. In his critique time becomes an issue of constraint
accompanied by international pressure primarily forged by the United States
to maintain a dialogue.
He purports that to alter the situation requires a
transformation of Palestinian hostility and policies and practices of the
international community including the US in acknowledgement of such
behavior. Detractors are however aware of contradictions to such claim and
reference Washington ’s
admonishment and condemnation of Palestinian undertakings via White House and
UN proclamations and ultimately ostracism of Arafat for related reasons.
Hanan Ashrawi, a well respected academe and Palestinian
legislator is of the opinion that her party is the subject of partiality which
fortifies Israeli dismissive attitude on key elements associated with the
establishment of a Palestinian state namely the transfer of seized property,
the creation and/or dismantling of settlements and security barricades, the
return of refugees and Palestinian rights to East Jerusalem. In current polls
conducted by the Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) the American
public also shared such sentiments by 58% and as a result championed UN supervision
by 41%.
US Middle East Policy
Do you think the US favors
Israeli 58%
Do you think the US favors the
Palestinians 4%
Is impartial 22%
Don’t know 16%
Stewardship of the Midde East Ordeal
Should the UN lead the charge
in the Middle East crisis 41%
A group of nations including
the US 27%
Local leadership 15%
According to Dr Ashrawi the Road Map’s emphasis on
gradualism and conditionality coupled with a lack of culpability and
arbitration has rendered this performance based proposition in concert with the
status quo. On a positive note nonetheless the most recent official
Palestinian/Israeli encounter and a moratorium on warfare that ensued entails
overtures that could become cornerstones towards a resolution.
Outcome of the 2005 Palestinian/Israeli Conference
Issue Concessions
Armistice a
halt to violence and military activity
Prisoners the
release of 900 convicts
Transfer of towns security
control of 5 West Bank
municipalities
Welcoming
likewise is the international convention hosted by British Prime Minister
Tony Blair with representatives from the US, UN, Arab
League, World Bank and the IMF in attendance confirming the right to the
existence of Palestine and America’s congressional request of $200 million in
fiscal offerings to the Palestinians.
In spite of antagonism in the form of the Tel Aviv suicide
bombing that claimed the lives of 5 while wounding dozens Sharon must consider his suspension of
conciliatory gestures – a freeze on the release of 400 prisoners and 5 enclaves
providing his objectives are in accordance with the fulfillment of goodwill.
Meanwhile the Bush administration must encourage Israel to satisfy its obligations.
Since the conception of the state of Israel in 1949 America has
endured a seamless friendship with her Jewish counterpart at a cost of over
$100 billion.
US Monetary Contributions to Israel
FY 1995 – FY 2005
(billions in dollars)
Year Total
1995 3,102.4
1996 3,147.3
1997 3,132.1
1998 3,080.0
1999 3,010.0
2000 4,129.1
2001 2,876.1
2002 2,848.0
2003 3,742.1
(estimate)
2004 2,687.3
(estimate)
2005 2,630.0
(proposed)
Note: Loan guarantees are not
considered foreign aid and are therefore excluded
Semblance of a balanced relationship with the parties could
enhance a two prong result – political and economic sustenance in the region
and a reduction in military and financial aid hovering at or beyond $3 billion
annually or 30% of America’s foreign budget to a single recipient.
The United States must seize the moment presented by the
Road Map by facilitating close engagement with its Arab and European allies to
eliminate ambiguities that could undermine a fragile retreat and with the
abovementioned signatories provide tangible benefits such as housing,
employment and essential infrastructure in an effort to rebuild the Palestinian
economy and ultimately create a peaceful state of Palestine within a considerable
timeframe. The continuation of discriminatory conduct is a recipe for
unforeseen disaster.
No comments:
Post a Comment