By Leroy A. Binns Ph.D.
The long awaited Jamaican national election has replaced the
incumbent Edward P. G. Seaga with the former two term head of state Michael N.
Manley as the People’s National Party swept 44 of the 60 seats in the House of
Parliament.
Although Manley’s overwhelming support fell short of that in
1976 the political climate enhanced his return in a remarkable fashion. The
most recent referendum temporarily erased wide spread violence from the
electoral process and unequivocally signaled the need for social change.
As the scoop hits news stands, political pundits and
business tycoons continue to assess the transition. Joseph Treasurer of the New
York Times sees a flourishing economy at stake under the Manley regime as do
entrepreneurs who recall the economic deprivation faced by the private sector
in the 1970s. Nonetheless these misinformed observers chose to ignore the
fiscal ills of the past 8 years.
During Seaga’s tenure the autocratic leader’s relationship
with the IMF has increased the deficit by an alarming $2.5 billion and has
therefore created the following austerity measures: a decrease in the number of
students earning a higher education due to astronomical college fees, the
termination of much needed government employees, a substantial increase in the
cost of essential commodities and on many occasions the scarcity of basic
necessities amidst constant devaluations of the Jamaican currency. Moreover his
exclusive friendship with the United
States has prevented the island from
receiving technological assistance from nonaligned states – all of which the
previous administration claimed to have predicted well in advance of the
electoral showdown.
Over the years the incoming democratic socialist gained the
respect and commitment of Third World
counterparts and the working class for his unwavering stance on social justice.
However his most recent posture has been a Western compromise that is
diametrically opposed to the ideals of the disenfranchised. Illustrations of
Manley II include a yearning for intimacy with the Bush administration and its
underlings the IMF and the World Bank as opposed to an allegiance with socialist
tenets he oftentimes “heralded” in the 1970s.
Despite the horrifying remembrance of US hostilities towards
the Bishop regime in 1983, the Noriega administration in 1988 and most
significantly the PNP government in the latter half of the past decade, the
prime minister speaks of practicality when supporting concessions with the
White House yet such will result in the continuance of economic stagnation in
Jamaica and ultimate defeat. Instead in order to avoid crucial pitfalls such as
inflation, unemployment and illiteracy that are common symptoms of US imperialism
in the underdeveloped world the new leader must avert corruption, induce
productivity and forge an alliance with nonaligned nations in an effort to gain
economic independence.
For now the charismatic ruler’s flip flop may earn him a
pass at home and in the West but the death of this paradise island remains a
grave concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment